A ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' DIFFICULTY WITH VISUAL LEARNING STYLES IN SOLVING HOTS QUESTIONS ON CUBES AND BLOCK: ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' DIFFICULTY WITH VISUAL LEARNING STYLES IN SOLVING HOTS QUESTIONS ON CUBES AND BLOCK

Arini Ulfah  Hidayati; Yosef Setiawan

Authors

Arini Ulfah Hidayati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Bustanul Ulum Lampung Tengah
Yosef Setiawan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Bustanul Ulum Lampung Tengah

Keywords:

student’s difficulties, learning styles, visuals, NEP, HOTS

Abstract

This study aims to analyze student’s difficulties in solving HOTS questions on cubes and blocks. Learning styles are categorized into: visual, auditory and kinesthetic, but in this study the focus is on visual learning styles. The subjects of this study were 27 junior high school in grade VIII at Bustanul ‘Ulum School. This research method uses descriptive qualitative methods. Data collection uses questionnaires, tests, interviews and field notes. Data analysis refers to the Newman's Error Procedure (NEP) consisting of 5 types of errors, namely reading errors, comprehension errors, transformation errors, process skills errors, and encoding errors. The result shows that around 14,81% of the students had difficulties in comprehension, 56,79% in transformation, 80, 24% in process skills, and 4,94 %in encoding. Students had the most difficulty at C5 and C6 levels questions. This is due to the inability of students to translate from verbal language into mathematical language or symbolic language and students are less stimulated with HOTS questions in mathematics.

References

Airasian, P, W., & Miranda, H. 2002. The Role of Assessment in the Revised Taxonomy. The Ohio State University, 41(1), 249-254

Ampur, G.R.T., Susilo, D. A., & Fayeldi, T.2021. Analisis kesalahan siswa pada pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan Newman’s error analysis. RAINSTEK: Jurnal terapan sains dan teknologi, 3(1). 1-5

Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Lonman, Inc

Bire, A.L., Gerdaus, U., & Bire, J. 2014. Pengaruh gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan, 44(2), 168-174.

DePorter B, and Mike, H. 2013. Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kafia

Creswell J.W. 2016. Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, Apino,E., and Wulandari, N.F. 2018. “The Difficulties Of High School Students In Solving Higher-Order,”PROBLEMS OF EDUCATION IN THE 21st CENTURY, 76(4), 520-530.

Jamal, F. 2018. Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pertidaksamaan Kuadrat Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman. Maju, 5(2), 41–51.

Khoeron, I. R., Sumarna, N., & Permana, T. 2014. Pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap prestasi belajar peserta didik pad mata pelajaran produktif. Journal of mechanical engineering education, 2(1). 291-297.

Rahmawati, D., & Permata, L. D. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Program Linear Dengan Prosedur Newman. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(2), 173–185

Resnick, L.B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington: National Academy

Saido, G. A. M., Siraj, S., Nordin, A. B., & Al-amedy, O. S. 2015. Teaching Strategies for promoting higher order thinking skills: A case of secondary science teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Manajement, 3(4), 16-30

Newman, M. A. 1983. Strategies for diagnosis and remediation. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich