• Erna Nurkholida IAIN KEDIRI
  • Annisa Aulia Saharani IAIN KEDIRI


Google Site, Language Service, R and D


This research aims to design and develop open educational resources. Research and development techniques are applied in this work (R&D). The findings of this study are available in open English source on the Google Site. This product was tested on students with a sample of 55 students. The results of this research on developing of open educational materials are as follows: expert validity test, multimedia validity, and material practicality test The results from expert validation tests (lecturers) and multimedia experts indicate the feasibility value of open education sources, with an average value of 77.59 which means good. The findings showed that the practicality of teaching materials in the form of prototypes of teaching materials in this practicality test can be used with slight adjustments or with slight revisions, the data on practicality has a value of 4.33 with very practical criteria. While student respondents about the perception of point of view, perception of usefulness, perception of enjoyment, and perceptions of challenges and obstacles from the use of this product. The results show that for the point of view perception score, 76% of students agree that online courses enable self-learning more than the 'classic' face to face course. For the usability category, the score is 72% agreeing with the online course design permits students to educate at their own speed. As for the perception of enjoyment, getting a score of 70% agree that overall, they found online course is interesting. For perceptions of obstacles and challenges, they answered with a score of 85% agreeing that insufficient/unstable internet connectivity was the main obstacle. From these results, it is known that the four aspects of the response are positive, so it leads to the conclusion that students' interest in the "Open Educational Resources" program for online learning is high.

Keywords: (Google Site, R and D, Language Service)


Kusumah, Inu Hardi. 2011. INVOTEC, Volume VII, No. 1, Februari 2011. Diakses 18 Agustus 2018

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih, (2008), Pengembangan Kurikulum Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Oemar Hamalik, Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010 P, Hendricks. 2010 Palilingan, Verry Ronny. 2014. INVOTEC, Volume X, No.2, Agustus 2014.

Sugiyono, 2009, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung : Alfabeta.

Subandiyah, 1993, Pengembangan dan Inovasi Kurikulum, Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.

Suparlan, Tanya Jawab Pengembangan Kurikulum Materi Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

UU Sisdiknas No. 20 tahun 2003.

USA Journal of Information Technology Education: Research Volume 12, 2001