IMPROVING MATHEMATICAL CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODEL THROUGH STEM

Authors

  • Maydilla Fadiarahma Vistara UNNES
  • Baiq Aprilia Noor Anggraini Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Adi Satrio Ardiansyah Universitas Negeri Semarang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4897-9364
  • Mohammad Asikin Universitas Negeri Semarang

Keywords:

Mathematical creative thinking, Pbl, STEM

Abstract

21st century learning intensifies to use creativity in learning.  Creativity is essential for all disciplines and learning activities.  The STEM integrated PBL model is combined in a teaching material that is prepared with problems that are adapted to mathematical creative thinking indicators.  This research aims to study the improvement of creativity in mathematics learning through solving problems in creative ways.  The method used is quantitative using t-test, proportion test and N-Gain. The research was conducted at one of the state junior high schools in Semarang Regency. Quantitatively obtained an average pretest value of 72.44 and an average posttest value of 85. 66 and an N-gain test for all indicators of mathematical creative thinking averaged 0.51 with a medium improvement category. The fluency indicator gets a result of 0.38 in the medium category, the flexibility indicator 0.46 on the medium category, the elaboration indicator on 0.48 in the medium category, and the originality indicator gets a result of 0.64 in the medium category. The results showed that STEM learning with the PBL model can improve students' mathematical creative thinking skills through solving problems in teaching materials. The application of stem integrated PBL models can be integrated into interactive media or learning resource materials and integrating STEM learning can be done with direct practical activities.

Author Biographies

Adi Satrio Ardiansyah, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Mathematics Education Lecturer of Universitas Negeri Semarang

Mohammad Asikin, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Lecturer (Mathematics )

References

Craig, T. T., & Marshall, J. (2019). Effect of project-based learning on high school students’ state-mandated, standardized math and science exam performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1461–1488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21582

Erdoğan, V. (2019). Integrating 4C Skills of 21st Century into 4 Language Skills in EFL Classes. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(11), 113–124. www.ijern.com

Erlinawati, C. E., Bektiarso, S., & maryani. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berbasis Stem Pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 1–4.

Gazali, R. Y. (2016). Pengembangan bahan ajar matematika untuk siswa SMP berdasarkan teori belajar ausubel. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.10644

Jusuf, R., Sopandi, W., Wulan, A. R., & Sa’ud, U. S. (2019). Strengthening teacher competency through ICARE approach to improve literacy assessment of science creative thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(7), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.7.5

Kotseva, I. (2019). Engineering Design-Based Learning in Integrative STEM Education. Dl.Uctm.Edu, 1. https://dl.uctm.edu/see/node/jsee2019-1/9_SEE_19-11_p_62-67.pdf

Laforce, M., Noble, E., & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040092

Levenson, E., Swisa, R., & Tabach, M. (2018). Evaluating the potential of tasks to occasion mathematical creativity: definitions and measurements. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1450777

Maskur, R., Sumarno, Rahmawati, Y., Pradana, K., Syazali, M., Septian, A., & Palupi, E. K. (2020). The effectiveness of problem based learning and aptitude treatment interaction in improving mathematical creative thinking skills on curriculum 2013. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.375

Maulidia, F., Johar, R., & Andariah, A. (2019). a Case Study of Students’ Creativity in Solving Mathematical Problems Through Problem Based Learning. Infinity Journal, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i1.p1-10

Monica, Y., Rinaldi, A., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2021). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS : DAMPAK MODEL OPEN ENDED DAN ADVERSITY QUOTIENT ( AQ ) Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung , Lampung , Indonesia Universitas Hasyim Asy ’ ari , Jombang , Indonesia Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup ,. 10(2), 550–562.

Saironi, M., & Sukestiyarno, Y. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa dan Pembentukan Karakter Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa pada Pembelajaran Open Ended Berbasis Etnomatematika. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Educatio Research, 6(1), 76–88. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer

Sari, A. R., & Hardini, A. T. A. (2020). Meta Analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(1), 5.

Soumitra, D., Bruno, L., Rivera León, L., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2021). Global Innovation Index 2021: Tracking Innovation through the COVID-19 Crisis. In World Intellectual Property Organization (Issue 14th Edition). https://www.bloomberg.com/topics/global-innovation-index%0Ahttp://www.wipo.int/publications/ru/series/index.jsp?id=129

Subakti, D. P., Marzal, J., & Hsb, M. H. E. (2021). Pengembangan E-LKPD Berkarakteristik Budaya Jambi Menggunakan Model Discovery Learning Berbasis STEM Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 05(02), 1249–1264. https://www.j-cup.org/index.php/cendekia/article/view/629/339

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (10th ed.). IKAPI.

Triwahyuningtyas, D., Ningtyas, A. S., & Rahayu, S. (2020). The problem-based learning e-module of planes using Kvisoft Flipbook Maker for elementary school students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i2.34446

Downloads

Published

2022-08-09