EVOLUTION OF CONDITIONALITIES IN CCT PROGRAMS: A CHRONOLOGICAL REVIEW OF CCT PROGRAMS AND THE EMERGENCE OF RELIGIOSITY FOR ZAKAT INSTITUTIONS
Keywords:
ulasan kronologikal, syarat tingkah laku (conditionalities), bantuan tunai bersyarat (CCT), agama, institusi zakatAbstract
Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programs have emerged as pivotal instruments in global efforts to alleviate poverty and promote socio-economic development. This research presents a chronological review of the evolution of conditionalities within CCT programs, focusing on the dimensions utilized from their inception to the present day. Employing a methodology rooted in chronological review, this study traces the historical development and changes in conditionalities, exploring their adaptation in response to shifting policy landscapes, societal needs, and emerging challenges. Through an exhaustive examination of literature, policy documents, and program evaluations, this research unveils the dynamic evolution of conditionalities within CCT programs. The four primary conditionalities associated with CCT programs that are being implemented globally are, in general, employment, health, education, and other dimensions. The CCT conditionality transformation demonstrates that some countries, such as Brazil, enhance the conditionality dimension, whereas Chile increases the dimension but later decreases it. The United States and Argentina remain in the existing dimensions but change the name and structure of the program, while Kenya reduces the conditionality component. The findings underscore the multifaceted nature of conditionalities and their pivotal role in shaping the effectiveness and impact of CCT programs. By elucidating the historical trajectory of conditionalities, this research provides valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders seeking to design and implement contextually relevant and impactful CCT interventions. Furthermore, the integration of religiosity as a new dimension within conditionalities highlights the potential for fostering holistic development and social cohesion within Asnaf communities, particularly through the lens of Zakat institutions.
References
Alinsunurin, M. K. G. (2021). Governmentality and gendered realities: experiences from the Philippines’ cash transfer programme. Development in Practice, 31(3), 334-343.
Artuc, E., Cull, R., Dasgupta, S., Fattal, R., Filmer, D., Giné, X., Jacoby, H. G., Jolliffe, D., Kee, H. L., & Klapper, L. (2020). Toward successful development policies: Insights from research in development economics.
Bastagli, F., Hagen-Zanker, J., Harman, L., Barca, V., Sturge, G., Schmidt, T., & Pellerano, L. (2016). Cash transfers: what does the evidence say. A rigorous review of programme impact and the role of design and implementation features. London: ODI, 1(7).
Behrman, J. R., Parker, S. W., & Todd, P. E. (2011). Do conditional cash transfers for schooling generate lasting benefits?: A five-year followup of PROGRESA/oportunidades. Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 93-122.
Borges, F. (2022). Human Capital versus Basic Income: Ideology and Models for Anti-Poverty Programs in Latin America. University of Michigan Press.
Chelle, E. (2018). Frame, Funnel, Deter: The Mechanisms of Behavioral Targeting. Creating Target Publics for Welfare Policies: a Comparative and Multi-Level Approach, 69-92.
Coetzee, M. (2013). Finding the Benefits: Estimating the Impact of The S outh A frican Child Support Grant. South African Journal of Economics, 81(3), 427-450.
De Brauw, A., & Hoddinott, J. (2011). Must conditional cash transfer programs be conditioned to be effective? The impact of conditioning transfers on school enrollment in Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 96(2), 359-370.
Dubois, P., De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2012). Effects on school enrollment and performance of a conditional cash transfer program in Mexico. Journal of Labor Economics, 30(3), 555-589.
Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. R. (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7352-1
Ford, K. J., Lourenço, B. H., Cobayashi, F., & Cardoso, M. A. (2020). Health outcomes of the Bolsa Família program among Brazilian Amazonian children. Revista de Saúde Pública, 54, 2.
Gennetian, L. A., Shafir, E., Aber, J. L., & De Hoop, J. (2021). Behavioral insights into cash transfers to families with children. Behavioral Science & Policy, 7(1), 71-92.
Glassman, L. W. (2018). “You help them out and god gets the glory:” social class and inequality in a fundamentalist Christian church. Social Inclusion, 6(2), 127-139.
Grijalva-Eternod, C. S., Jelle, M., Mohamed, H., Waller, K., Osman Hussein, B., Barasa, E., Solomon, A., Mehjabeen, S., Copas, A., & Fottrell, E. (2023). Evaluation of conditional cash transfers and mHealth audio messaging in reduction of risk factors for childhood malnutrition in internally displaced persons camps in Somalia: A 2× 2 factorial cluster-randomised controlled trial. PLoS medicine, 20(2), e1004180.
Hanlon, J., Barrientos, A., & Hulme, D. (2012). Just give money to the poor: The development revolution from the global South. Kumarian Press.
Harian, S. (2022). Asnaf tidak sepatutnya terus dimanjakan. Astro Awani. https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/asnaf-tidak-sepatutnya-terus-dimanjakan-373080
Hartarto, R. B., Wardani, D. T. K., & Azizurrohman, M. (2021). A Qualitative Study of Conditional Cash Transfer and Education Aspirations: Evidence from Yogyakarta. Journal of Social Service Research, 47(6), 776-785. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2021.1918314
Huber, E., Kassabian, D., Cohen, E., & P23320095654WC, H. (2013). Welfare Rules Databook: State TANF Policies as of July 2013 final report. Children, 48.
Ibarrarán, P., Medellín, N., Regalia, F., Stampini, M., Parodi, S., & Tejerina, L. (2017). How conditional cash transfers work: good practices after 20 years of implementation. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Washington, DC.
Ibrahim, M. F., & Chek, N. M. B. T. (2020). The concept of al-falah maximization: zakat and industry revolution 4.0. Labuan e-Journal of Muamalat and Society (LJMS), 14, 11-22.
Kabeer, N., Piza, C., & Taylor, L. (2012). What are the economic impacts of conditional cash transfer programmes? A systematic review of the evidence. EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education & University of London (eds.).
Kattel, P., & Mohan, K. (2021). Conditional cash transfers and embedded extension: A mechanism to restore and promote adoption of improved goat shelters in emergency recovery. Progress in Disaster Science, 10, 100152.
Levy, S. (2007). Progress against poverty: sustaining Mexico's Progresa-Oportunidades program. Rowman & Littlefield.
Osei, K. B., & Turkson, D. (2022). Cash transfer and multidimensional child poverty: evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Social Economics, 49(5), 744-764.
Senadjki, A., & Sulaiman, J. (2015). An empirical study on the influence of Islamic values in poverty alleviation. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 6(2), 222-243.
Silva, F. d. S., Queiroz, R. C. d. S., Branco, M. d. R. F. C., Simões, V. M. F., Barbosa, Y. C., Rodrigues, M. A. F. R. d. A., Barbieri, M. A., Bettiol, H., Saraiva, M. d. C. P., & Scorzafave, L. G. (2020). Bolsa Família program and incomplete childhood vaccination in two Brazilian cohorts. Revista de Saúde Pública, 54, 98.
Son, H. H. (2008). Conditional cash transfer programs: an effective tool for poverty alleviation?
Tommasi, D. (2019). Control of resources, bargaining power and the demand of food: Evidence from PROGRESA. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 161, 265-286.
Verbist, G., & Matsaganis, M. (2014). The redistributive capacity of services in the European Union. Reconciling work and poverty reduction: how successful are European welfare states, 185-211.
Wetzel, D. (2013). Bolsa Família: Brazil’s Quiet Revolution. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/opinion/2013/11/04/bolsa-familia-Brazil-quiet-revolution
Zulkhibri, M. (2016). The relevance of conditional cash transfers in developing economy: the case of Muslim countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(12), 1513-1538. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-06-2014-0116
