Aswaja An-Nahdliyah in the Age of Generative AI: An Ethical-Epistemological Framework
Keywords:
Aswaja An-Nahdliyah, generative AI, epistemic authority, tabayyun, AI ethicsAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence can accelerate knowledge work while increasing exposure to fabricated sources, misplaced confidence, representational bias, and uncertain scholarly authority. This conceptual study reconstructs Aswaja An-Nahdliyah as a situated ethical-epistemological framework for assessing AI-assisted knowledge production. An integrative, non-systematic review connects research on language-model risks, responsible AI, Islamic ethics, and Nahdlatul Ulama’s normative orientations. Comparative interpretation and negative-case reasoning yield four interdependent checkpoints: tawassuth assesses the purpose and proportionality of AI use; tawazun establishes meaningful human interpretive control; i‘tidal evaluates representational justice and attributable responsibility; and tabayyun requires evidence tracing, claim assessment, contextual interpretation, and publication-risk review. Together they constitute the Aswaja Ethical-Epistemological Framework for Generative AI (AEEGA). Its proposed novelty does not consist in discovering Islamic AI ethics or inventing a new verification obligation. Rather, it couples culturally grounded normative reasoning with an inspectable sequence that distinguishes generated content, justified claims, and authorized scholarly judgment. Compared with existing Islamic virtue-based, trusteeship, Aswaja cyber-ethics, and general AI-risk approaches, AEEGA specifically addresses the transition from probabilistically generated religious or academic statements to accountable knowledge claims. A worked hypothetical case illustrates possible institutional application. The framework remains a theoretical proposition, not an empirically validated instrument; its discriminant validity, usability, and effects require testing with scholars, educators, and students. This contribution supports pluralist AI governance without replacing technical audits, qualified interpretation, or legal protection.
